Kind Words from Terry Laundry, Founder of T Theory

"Parker has sent me what I consider to be the most important refinements to T Theory I have ever received from anyone in an e-mail . . . which he calls Tweaking the 13th Advance Decline T." September 29, 2010

"Parker has sent me a very interesting concept which is the NY Advance Decline line divided by the put-call ratio . . . What he's done is introduce the idea of sentiment." September 15, 2010

"Parker discovered the Money Flow Ts . . . This is something like the Holy Grail in T Theory. You are always looking for something that will help you refine the peak date." October 17, 201

"Money Flow Ts are probably the greatest new thing I have seen in 20 years in terms of time symmetries."
December 5, 2010.
Showing posts with label Point and Figure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Point and Figure. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

$$ More Fun with Point & Figure

So I wondered what the S&P P&F price target was back in early April 2010 before the April 26 climax.  Turns out, if you draw a daily P&F chart using 3.8 points per box, you connect the March 2009 low with the February 2010 low.  This matches the 1x1 P&F trend line to the dominant trend support line at the time.

The P&F price target was 1330.  We failed to reach that target of course, but I find it interesting that we are encountering a bunch of resistance at 1330 recently.

$$ Fun with Point & Figure Price Targets

I'm experimenting with Point & Figure charts.  I have long been interested in them for their graphical depiction of support and resistance, as well as their price targeting.

However, there are so many different ways to set up a P&F chart that I am often left confused.  Should I use traditional settings?  Percentage settings?  Should I use Average True Range settings?  If so, what ATR period should I use?  To confound matters, each of these different settings seems to produce a different price target.

So I have come up with an idea I am trying out with respect to price targeting.  I experiment with the "User Defined" settings until I come up with a box size and a time period that allows me to match the dominant trend line on a normal chart to the 1x1 trend line on a P&F chart. 

For example, on a normal S&P 500 chart the dominant trend line connects the March 2009 low with the August 2010 low.  In order for me to construct a daily P&F chart that has a 1x1 trend line which correlates, I have to use a box size of 2.15 points.  When I do, I get a bullish price objective for the entire move since March 2009 of 1369.55:




































But wait, there's more.  In order for me to construct a P&F chart whose 1x1 trend line matches a normal chart connecting the late August 2010 and late November 2010 lows, I have to go to a 60 minute setting with a box size of 4.0 points.  When I do, I get a price objective of 1348.0:






















Finally, if I choose 1.141 points per box on a 30 minute chart, I can construct a P&F chart whose 1x1 trend line connects the late November 2010 and late January 2011 lows.  When I do, I get a price objective of 1352.09:























What does all this mean?  Like I said, I'm experimenting so who the hell knows.  But here's a guess:  the current move in the S&P tops out at (or perhaps fails to achieve) 1348-52, we get a correction, and the next move (which is expected to top in late May or early June per the 14-week cycle) culminates at 1369.55.

We'll revisit this post in the future and see how it turns out.  In the meantime, if there are any P&F experts out there, please feel free to chime in.