Kind Words from Terry Laundry, Founder of T Theory

"Parker has sent me what I consider to be the most important refinements to T Theory I have ever received from anyone in an e-mail . . . which he calls Tweaking the 13th Advance Decline T." September 29, 2010

"Parker has sent me a very interesting concept which is the NY Advance Decline line divided by the put-call ratio . . . What he's done is introduce the idea of sentiment." September 15, 2010

"Parker discovered the Money Flow Ts . . . This is something like the Holy Grail in T Theory. You are always looking for something that will help you refine the peak date." October 17, 201

"Money Flow Ts are probably the greatest new thing I have seen in 20 years in terms of time symmetries."
December 5, 2010.

Sunday, March 20, 2011

$$ Weekend Update Posted

Terry has published my latest article at TTheory.com.   I have discovered that the market is vibrating to an exciting new cycle based on the Golden Ratio which projects a June 13, 2011 top.  Check it out, and let me know your thoughts.

10 comments:

  1. I'm sure you're already aware that June 13-14 also coincides with Armstrong's turn date?

    http://www.martinarmstrong.org/economic_projections.htm

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi sdmooks

    Yes - I've known about that turn date awhile. Except it's supposed to be an 8.6 year low in economic confidence.

    I guess it could be an 8.6 year low in the confidence of the US Dollar. But it appears to be high for stocks and gold.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The post was quite interesting. Elliot wave practioners also use the golden ratio as an aid in projecting wavelengths.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Marty has mentioned his next turn date being June 18-24 2011. He is using an 8.615384615 year cycle.

    I agree Parker that it is probably a bottom in the dollar or bonds or could in fact be a bottom in another market all together.

    ReplyDelete
  5. interesting, for you loonies out there.
    June 15th is a full moon.
    http://www.fullmoon.info/en/fullmoon-calendar.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. Parker...
    Very interesting...
    After seeing your 14 week cycle presentation I saw a 67 Trading Day cycle, which is roughly 14 weeks, on another blog with a totally different approach...
    Please feel free to look at it at...
    http://bit.ly/geV6Ca
    Impressed with the new findings you keep coming up with!
    Thx...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks Just Signals.

    I noticed that shortly after I posted about the 14-week cycle on T-Theory.com, Andre Gratian first wrote about the 68-day trading cycle.

    http://www.safehaven.com/article/19977/market-turning-points

    ReplyDelete
  8. Gann talked of these shorter cycles 60 years ago in his course work along with the 40 year cycle which the Bible talked of long before him ........."nothing new under the sun". Good trading! joed

    ReplyDelete
  9. Parker...thank you for that interesting link...Since being introduced to cycles, I had a hard time using individual short term or intermediate term cycles, since so much occurred in between the full cycle dates...So instead, I have been using a composite of several cycles...

    ReplyDelete
  10. If that is the case then this bottom we just saw was the center post of the T because the span from Dec 10 reading in the VO through that bottom projects a top on June 17th. DID you account for market hilidays (Memorial Day) in yor calculations? There is a cycle low projected for March 24th off the recent high which happens to agree with the inverted Money Flow T I drew recently. After todays move up and back through the midchannel I am not as certain about a second bottom here. I guess under conservative rules we still could have a top coming in June off this first bottom even if we have a second bottom. It makes sense that we would turn around today due to coming near the zero line on the VO today. At any rate we have already seen the bottom or are about to. There still is the idea that we may have seen an important top and that upside is limited to the old top and no higher. This is a lot of info to consider but great to have it to consider.

    ReplyDelete